|
Anmerkung: BARRON'S BOOK NOTES (tm) on CD-ROM Windows (tm) Ver. 2.0 1929 ERICH MARIA REMARQUE'S ALL QUIET ON THE WESTERN FRONT by Rose Kam
OTHER ELEMENTS
The story told in All Quiet on the Western Front occurs during
the two years just before the Armistice ended World War I in November
1918. In Chapters 1 and 2 we learn that Paul Baumer, the narrator,
and his friend Kat had been together three years- one year longer
than the time period covered by the novel.
By 1916 when the story begins, World War I had already been underway
for two years. It broke out in August 1914 between the Allies
(Britain, France, Russia, Belgium, Serbia, and later the United
States) and the Central Powers (Austria-Hungary and Germany).
In June 1914 Austrian Archduke Frances Ferdinand and his wife
had been assassinated at Sarajevo by a Serbian nationalist, leading
to Austria-Hungary's declaration of war on Serbia. German leaders,
alarmed at Russian mobilization and eager to establish the Reich
as a power on a par with Britain, declared war on both of Germany's
neighbors, Russia and France. They also refused to guarantee the
neutrality of Belgium. Great Britain, in turn, declared war on
Germany in response to the threat to British allies. At the time,
Paul and his classmates would have been 16-year-old schoolboys.
German desire to become a major power was nothing new. Prussian
beliefs included the idea that Germany had to be a military state
because it lacked natural protective boundaries. The Prussian
goal was to make Germany a glittering, well-organized, self-confident
machine. The idea that Paul rejects- 18-year-olds as Iron Youth-
fits perfectly into this Prussian mentality.
From the beginning, World War I was fought in two areas, named
for their geographical relationship to Germany. The Eastern Front
extended into Russia, and the Western Front extended through Belgium
into northern France. Germany hoped to knock out France in six
weeks and then turn its full strength against Russia. The Allies,
however, soon halted the German army at the Marne River, and the
war in the West settled down to four years of trench warfare-
the static or at a standstill kind of war described in the discussion
of Chapter 6 in this guidebook.
In All Quiet, Paul describes a battle with the French in Chapter
6 and then, a short time later, is assigned to a camp (Chapter
8) where he guards Russian prisoners of war. Although he does
not name the exact locations for the military offensives he describes-
after all, the place names had little to do with life and death-
the offensive in Chapter 6 could have been the French attack in
1917 at Aisne and Champagne. That offensive failed, with heavy
French losses.
Meanwhile, behind the Fronts, all resources were being directed
toward winning the war. At first, military methods used were mostly
those from earlier wars- infantry, cavalry, and artillery- but
this war boosted production of tanks, planes, machine guns, high-explosive
shells, flamethrowers, and poison gas. The strong industrial push
left little for civil life, and economies and governments were
shattered all over Europe. Forced drafts of men, food shortages,
attacks on civilian populations, and hysteria reached heights
never before seen.
It is during this final period that the last few chapters of All
Quiet occur.
By late 1917 Germany had won the war in the East. In March 1918,
Russia signed the harsh treaty of Brest-Litovsk, giving Germany
huge chunks of its territory. Russia's withdrawal enabled Germany
to transfer forces from the East and to mount a supreme effort
to capture Paris. But by this time the United States was entering
the war, and timing was essential to the German plan: the offensive
had to succeed before American troops could reach the Western
Front in sizable numbers. Ludendorff, the German leader who directed
the operation, was prepared to lose one minion men to win. He
poured his efforts onto the British sector. The situation became
so desperate that the Allies stopped arguing among themselves
and established a unified command under Marshal Ferdinand Foch.
Nevertheless, at its height the German offensive came within 40
miles of Paris. Then in May 1918 American divisions poured in,
and the Allies fought back furiously. In July they broke through
the new German lines and swept the Central Powers back toward
the pre-1914 frontiers.
In the fall of 1918, German allies began to surrender- in September
the Bulgarians, in October the Turks. One by one, ethnic minorities
within Austria-Hungary began to proclaim independence, and on
November 3 the Austrians capitulated. Germans were demoralized,
and mutinies broke out in German fleets. There were revolts among
civilians in Kiel and Hamburg. In early November the German king
or emperor, Kaiser Wilhelm, fled to Holland. Finally, on November
11, 1918, a German delegation appeared at Allied headquarters
to request an armistice.
Overall, the war was fought at tremendous cost. Most tragic was
the loss in lives. Known dead included 1.8 million German soldiers
and more than one million men each from Russia, France, Austria-Hungary,
the United Kingdom, and Italy. Even the U.S., latecomer to the
war, lost more than 100,000 men. Actual fatalities have been estimated
as high as 13 million. In addition, nearly 22 million men were
wounded, 7 million of them permanently disabled or mutilated.
More than 9 million civilians were also killed.
The world of 1919 was stunned and uncertain. Ten years later the
mood still lingered. People wanted to understand what had happened
but could not. It is in that atmosphere that Remarque's All Quiet
on the Western Front appeared.
- THEMES -
In the short note that comes just before Chapter 1, Remarque lets
us know exactly what theme he intends. He says that All Quiet
on the Western Front is the story of a generation of young men
who were destroyed by World War I- even if they survived the shelling.
To arrive at a fifth statement of this main theme, Remarque weaves
several related themes into the story. The outline that follows
points out chapters you can read to see how he presents each idea.
- 1. THE HORROR OF WAR -
Remarque includes discussions among Paul's group, and Paul's own
thoughts while he observes Russian prisoners of war (Chapters
3, 8, 9) to show that no ordinary people benefit from a war. No
matter what side a man is on, he is killing other men just like
himself, people with whom he might even be friends at another
time.
But Remarque doesn't just tell us war is horrible. He also shows
us that war is terrible beyond anything we could imagine. All
our senses are assaulted: we see newly dead soldiers and long-dead
corpses tossed up together in a cemetery (Chapter 4); we hear
the unearthly screaming of the wounded horses (Chapter 4); we
see and smell three layers of bodies, swelling up and belching
gases, dumped into a huge shell hole (Chapter 6); and we can almost
touch the naked bodies hanging in trees and the limbs lying around
the battlefield (Chapter 9). The crying of the horses is especially
terrible. Horses have nothing to do with making war. Their bodies
gleam beautifully as they parade along- until the shells strike
them. To Paul, their dying cries represent all of nature accusing
Man, the great destroyer.
In later chapters Paul no longer mentions nature as an accuser
but seems to suggest that nature is simply there- rolling steadily
on through the seasons, paying no attention to the desperate cruelties
of men to each other. This, too, shows the horror of war, that
it is completely unnatural and has no place in the larger scheme
of things.
- 2. A REJECTION OF TRADITIONAL VALUES -
In his introductory note Remarque said that his novel was not
an accusation. But we have seen that it is, in many places, exactly
that. This accusation- or rejection of traditional militaristic
values of Western civilization- is impressed on the reader through
the young soldiers, represented by Paul and his friends, who see
military attitudes as stupid and who accuse their elders of betraying
them.
In an early chapter Paul admits that endless drilling and sheer
harassment did help toughen his group and turn them into soldiers.
But he points out, often, how stupid it is to stick to regulations
at the front- how insane this basic military attitude becomes
in life-and-death situations. One such scene occurs in Chapter
1 when Ginger, the cook, doesn't want to let 80 men eat the food
prepared for 150, no matter how hungry they are. Another occurs
in Chapter 7 when Paul is walking around in his hometown and a
major forces him to march double time and salute properly- a ridiculous
display, considering what he has just been through at the front.
The emptiness of all this spit and polish shows up again in Chapter
9 when the men have to return the new clothes they were issued
for the Kaiser's inspection: rags are what's real at the front.
The betrayal of the young by their elders becomes an issue on
several occasions. In the first two chapters of the book we learn
how misguided Paul was by the teachings of parents and schoolmasters.
We also see how older people cling to the Prussian mythof the
glory of military might when Paul goes home on leave in Chapter
7. The Kaiser's visit in Chapter 9 adds some hints of Remarque's
specific disillusionment with the leaders of his own country.
From a broad study of literature and world history, we can see
that these older people were not individually to blame for their
views. They were simply handing on what was handed on to them.
Still, we can also understand why Paul and his friends are so
bitterly disappointed and so angry to discover that their elders
were wrong. Most readers feel alittle sad that young men should
consider the act of ridiculing adults their greatest goal in life,
but we can also understand why they take revenge on Himmelstoss
and Kantorek (Chapters 3 and 7). We even get a certain kick out
of what they do, understanding their need to take out their disappointment
on someone they know. These situations are, in miniature, an acting
out of the bitter anger and disillusionment Paul feels when he
says in Chapter 10, "It must all be lies and of no account
when the culture of a thousand years could not prevent this stream
of blood being poured out."
- 3. FRIENDSHIP: THE ONLY ENDURING VALUE -
The theme of comradeship occurs often and gives the novel both
lighthearted and sad moments. In Chapter 5 it's easy to overlook
how the farmer felt about having his property stolen and to chuckle
aloud when Paul is struggling to capture the goose! We appreciate
the circle of warmth that encloses him and Kat that night as they
slowly cook and eat the goose, and then extend their warm circle
by sharing the leftovers with Kropp and Tjaden. In Chapter 10
we enjoy their sharing of the pancakes and roast pig and fine
club chairs at the supply dump, and we understand why Paul fakes
a high temperature to go to the same hospital as Albert Kropp.
Friendship emerges as an even more important theme at the front.
In Chapters 10 and 11 we see men helping wounded comrades at great
personal risk- or even, like Lieutenant Bertinck, dying for their
friends. The handing on of Kemmerich's fine yellow leather boots
also acts as a symbol of friendship- a symbol we can almost touch,
and one that keeps us aware of how deeply a soldier feels the
loss of each of his special friends. We can understand how hearing
the voices of friends when one is lost (Chapter 9) or even just
hearing their breathing during the night (Chapter 11) can keep
a soldier going. We grieve with Paul and almost put down the book
when Kat dies.
4. A GENERATION DESTROYED BY WORLD WAR I
Taking all of the themes together and adding Paul and his friends'
hopeless discussions of what is left for them to do after the
war (Chapter 5), we can conclude that Remarque succeeds in his
main theme: showing that Paul's generation was destroyed by the
Great War, as World War I was then called.
STYLE
STYLE AND STRUCTURE
All Quiet on the Western Front is, on the whole, a very serious
and even a grim novel. Remarque presents his message through vivid
description and imagery. The tone is not overwhelmingly bitter.
Two things stand out in Remarque's style: his vivid word pictures
and the way he balances contrasting scenes against each other
to make each one stand out. His descriptions bring every chapter
to life, whether he is showing us the glare of flares or the darkness
beyond the trenches, vicious rats or itchy lice, the steady drumlike
beat of bombardment or the piercing shrieks of shells and wounded.
His descriptions also include images of beauty and peace- usually
in Paul's thoughts- that make clear how awful the front actually
is. He converts a pair of boots, a goose, and the circle of light
cast by campfires into symbols of friendship. And he uses similes
to show the brutality of war: the men fight like thugs, like wild
beasts. The tanks push relentlessly forward like steel beasts
squashing bugs.
CH FAR FROM THE FRONT NEAR THE FRONT AT THE FRONT
1 Recollections: Second Company, school, Kantorek. down to 80
men, well fed.
2 Recollections: Kemmerich's death Himmelstoss, in a field hospital.
basic training The boots.
3 Reminiscences: Kat's skill at Himmelstoss. foraging. Theories
of war.
4 Barbed wire duty. The wounded horses The upturned graves.
5 Insubordination to Himmelstoss. Lack of post-war goals. The
goose incident.
6 Days upon days of trench warfare. Company down to 32 men. Westhus
wounded.
7 Paul home on The evening with leave. the French girls. Mittelstaedt's
humiliation by Kantorek.
8 Paul guarding the Russian prisoners of war.
9 The Kaiser's visit. Paul's killing of Duval in the trench.
10 The hospital. The supply dump. Kropp left behind.
11 Starvation, lack of supplies, demoralization. Loss of Detering,
Muller, Leer, Kat.
12 Paul's death on a quiet day.
Remarque's use of contrast, gives a new meaning to the phrase
"theater of war." He keeps us moving between the trenches
and the rest of the world. Even if Paul's hometown is suffering
from war shortages, life there is safe and comfortable compared
with the front. Even the hospital, filled with wounded, offers
clean sheets and regular food- luxuries unimaginable at the front
lines. These contrasts help us to understand what is happening
to the emotional life of the young soldier.
The above chart will help you see more clearly how Remarque uses
contrasts. The first part of All Quiet dwells on what happened
at home, far from the front, and what it is like near the front.
The middle chapters actually take us to the front and then pull
us back several times- to civilian life, to a camp behind the
lines, to a supply dump, to a hospital- so that we too feel the
shock when we return, in the final chapters, to the unrelieved
pressures of the front.
Finally, Remarque's style includes irony. We fully appreciate
how little value is attached to a single human life by 1918 when
we read the army report on the progress of the war on the day
Paul dies: "All quiet on the Western Front."
POINT OF VIEW
Stories usually are told from the first person or the third person
point of view. We get these terms from grammar. "I love"
is a first person structure, "you love" is second person,
and "he (or she) loves" is third person. A story is
told in the first person when the narrator says that I or we are
doing thus-and-so: someone actually in the story is telling it.
A third person story uses the he or they approach; some unnamed
person outside the story is observing others doing something.
Except for the very last two paragraphs of the book, All Quiet
on the Western Front is written from the first person point of
view. The story is being told by someone who is actually in it-
Paul Baumer- not by some invisible outsider. Remarque does switch
to third person in the last two paragraphs for an obvious reason:
Paul cannot report his own death. First person narration always
has both advantages and disadvantages. A big advantage is that
we tend to identify with the main character. In All Quiet we feel
as if we are right there with Paul, experiencing what he is seeing
and hearing and feeling. We almost think his thoughts, share his
ideas. First person narration makes the whole story seem direct
and real and honest. On the other hand, first person narration
also limits us to knowing and seeing only what the narrator- in
this case, Paul- knows and sees. We get other news and views and
opinions only as he filters them and reports them to us.
In the case of All Quiet, Paul is young and immature. Until he
enlisted, he had never experienced real pain or tragedy in his
life. Older people generally know from experience that human beings
can survive incredible pain and still find meaning in life. Paul
hasn't had any time to gain that kind of experience to sustain
him. Therefore it's asking quite a bit to have us accept, from
him, whole theories about war and life and the nature of human
beings. Still, whatever Paul might lack in age or experience is
balanced for us by the honesty and sensitivity we see in him.
Over all, then, in All Quiet on the Western Front, the advantages
of first person narration outweigh the disadvantages. There is
a perfect fit of first person point of view with what Remarque
wanted to say about World War I- that it destroyed a whole generation
of the young. How better to show us that than to let us experience
the war through the eyes of a young soldier?
- FORM -
When critics use the word form to discuss a novel, they sometimes
mean its overall style and structure- the elements already presented
under that heading in this guidebook. Another meaning of form
is the category a novel falls into- how it should be classified,
what kind of fiction it is. You yourself use from in this narrow,
second meaning when you say that you like to read mysteries or
westerns or romances or some other kind of story. But if someone
asked you what kind of book All Quiet is, you would find that
it just doesn't fit standard classifications. You might say it's
a war story- but it's a lot more than that. It's also a story
about a boy turning into a disillusioned adult, or perhaps a story
telling society that it ought to eliminate the great evil of war.
The standard categories simply do not express all that.
The best term for a novel in which everything depends on a specific
war setting is historical novel. Charles Dickens' A Tale of Two
Cities, set during the French Revolution, is an example. All Quiet
does happen during World War I, but Remarque doesn't dwell on
historical details such as names of battles. Instead he concentrates
much more on what any war does to people. Usually a novel in which
a young person matures by passing through some kind of crisis
is called a novel of formation or a novel of initiation. This
fits Stephen Crane's The Red Badge of Courage, in which Henry
Fleming starts out as a naive boy, expecting war to be glorious,
only to find how terrible it is. It also fits All Quiet to some
extent, but not as well- by the time the book begins, Paul has
already become disillusioned enough to call 70 deaths a "miscalculation."
If you see All Quiet as a novel telling society something wrong
ought to be changed- in this case, war- you could try sociological
novel, but again the label seems somehow off. It fits a book against
slavery like Harriet Beecher Stowe's Uncle Tom's Cabin but seems
to express only one element of All Quiet. All in all, form as
classification is simply too narrow and artificial for this book.
With All Quiet, you are better off using the word form in its
broad senses meaning style and structure. All Quiet can be described
as a novel made up of dramatic scenes, vivid language, and a series
of contrasting episodes that make us feel how totally destructive
war is.
|
